Or when he's moving from Kindergarten to 1st Grade and can't even write his name . . . my wife loves getting those kids.Originally Posted by SpankyNek
|
|
Or when he's moving from Kindergarten to 1st Grade and can't even write his name . . . my wife loves getting those kids.
Changed a lot. It takes an act of God to get a kid out of "regular classes". As has been pointed out in this thread, mommy and daddy tend to want to sue the school for pointing out that their kid has a learning disability or other issue. What they don't realize is, they're doing their child harm by leaving them in classes with teachers who are unqualified (in a lot of instances) to deal with their kid. It's really sad.
I know I pray quite a bit for my brother...more so lately. He teaches special needs high school kids. He hears threats quite a bit
As a "former" Marine, that guy is a giant douche...
Interesting...
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...Secret-Service
The following users like this post: SoonerArtillery
I'm not sure i agree but his final point couldn't be any better:
He continued: "I don't agree that conservatives and libertarians should view government legislation, especially at the federal level, as the solution to violence. Real change can happen only when we commit ourselves to rebuilding civil society in America, meaning a society based on family, religion, civic and social institutions, and peaceful cooperation through markets."
Ron Paul
Hmmmmmm . . . . 11 armed guards. Wonder how many that is per student?
I'm guessing 11 for two girls and none for the rest
You would be guessing wrong. Those 11 guards do not include Secret Service and are a part of the normal security procedure at the school.
I don't think it's such a big deal there are armed guards at a private school in the DC area where oodles of vulnerable children of the richest/most powerful people in the world attend.
So it's fine for the rich and powerful to have armed security for their kids but **** the rest of us and our kids?
The key word is private...I would imagine they also have far better facilities...
It's private school. You don't like private enterprise? COMMIE!
It's not. It's hypocritical though, and the hypocrisy gets old. Do as I say not as I do is becoming the norm of the 'ruling cl****.'
It might seem hypocritical if you can't tell the difference between a private school in the most important power-base in the world and general public schools all over the nation.
I realize its a private school. So again, it's fine for the private schools to provide adequate security but not the public ones?
The guns are fine for these politicians to have around them to protect themselves and their families but us common folk can't be trusted to with them to defend our families because of the crazies and the criminals. Funny thing is you won't find a greater collection of crazy and criminal than you will in the government.
The following users like this post: Cabbage_town_kid
Sure it is. It's okay to protect those kids but the same people enjoying those protections are going to push laws to make it harder for me to protect mine? Sorry.
no this is wrong. It's hypocritical b/c of people in washington being against armed guards in schools but sending his children to a school that has armed guards.
We all understand private schools can do what they want. Put public schools should have armed officers as well
The following users like this post: oucub23
Come one Mallen. You are smarter than this.
The rich and powerful want to enjoy the protection provided by legal private gun ownership and at the same time they want to make it harder for the common person to legally protect themselves with a gun. If you cant see the hypocrisy there you are simply trying not to.
2 users like Sancho's post: oucub23, soonerintn
You have a ****ed view of government if you think Pelosi grandstanding is the same thing as the government acting upon your right to bear arms.
I've not seen ONE meaningful restriction on your ability to own a handgun proferred by ANYONE. Not one. Hell, even the worst out of all of them, Ms. Nancy, isn't asking to take away handguns!!!! And newsflash- if it's going to be illegal for private citizens to have certain kinds of guns in the future, private security firms can't have them either. If they're given an exception, we can all hire a private security firm WHENEVER WE WANT. You can send your kids to super-security private schools right now, if you wish. There's no functional difference b/n them and us except they're rich and powerful, and we're not.
You idiots just like running around with your hair on fire over the smallest perceived slight.
There is a significant, significant difference b/n a private school hiring guards on their own, and the Orwellian idea that our public schools should become a lethally-armed security state.
I mean, this is a really simple distinction, people. You don't have to go to law school to see the difference.
Again you are missing the point entirely. Kinda surprising with your law school education and all
So the Democrats/Liberals dont actually want anything different regarding guns than the Republicans/Conservatives/Libertarians/Independents/Average people who they are demonizing want?
If you think the "two sides" are differing all that much, you're kidding yourself. Despite the NRA's tonedeaf and idiotic statement, the right isn't exactly championing guns right now that I've seen anywhere.
But that's besides the point. My point is that there's a significant difference b/n the two concepts that it's hardly hypocritical, and even if it is to some degree, CERTAINLY not to a large enough degree for y'all to get your panties in a wad..
Alright then. I havent seen any indication that the Right's stance has changed at all (or anyone else's for that matter).
I still contend that it is hypocritical to rail against gun ownership while enjoying it yourself.
$100 million lawsuit at the state of Connecticut because the secretary turned the intercom on.
I think I would just be happy my child survived.
Both institutions are schools so the difference isn't as significant as you'd like it to be.
Are you all worried about the cost or the fact that a public school would have an armed guard?
Help me see the difference.
I'm for armed security in school, but I'm not so blind to see the point mallen is making.
I think there is a HUGE difference between a private institution providing its own security at the request/need of the tuition payers versus the government mandating it against the will of a parent to make that choice.
First report I heard on the shooting about weapons used was he had pistols and they found a bushmaster AR is the trunk of the car. Then I heard he killed most of them with an AR (medical examiner said the wounds were from an AR) NOW I hear that they found 2 more pistols and in fact the AR was in the trunk. Anybody know the validity of this? This seems more and more like a political agenda massacre now. Strange **** going on.
There was a story right after the shooting about people scamming the public into sending money to a fund in the name of the victims. I am trying to figure out why the victims families are receiving money. Money would be the last thing on my mind if my child had just been killed.
Just as politicians will use this tragedy to promote agendas so will parents and attorneys to try and get rich.
This is really ridiculous. I hope a judge tells the lawyer how stupid this is and throws it out.
I never said I wanted it to be mandated.
Didn't say you did.
The nra stance was essentially the same as Clinton after columbine. If their almighty said so, it must be good.
Boy. Go to YouTube and search Sandy Hook staged, fake, etc. Afuckingmazing.
Wow
Geez these conspiracy theorists are ****ing stupid
I'm not interested in looking at but am curious to know what these idiots are doing.
You name it. The shooting was done by the government. It was a false flag. No one actually saw the kid shoot anyone. Who was it they let go? Who was walking in the woods? The people you saw were actors and fake parents. Dead kids supposedly showing up. The medical examiner was fake. Links between this and the Colorado shootings. The usual JFK/911/Moon Landing/OKC Bombinggang. I guess I've grown to expect it but I didn't expect it here.
The one interning one was the video of one of te victims in a pic with Obama.
U forgot the teacher that was an Israeli terroristYou name it. The shooting was done by the government. It was a false flag. No one actually saw the kid shoot anyone. Who was it they let go? Who was walking in the woods? The people you saw were actors and fake parents. Dead kids supposedly showing up. The medical examiner was fake. Links between this and the Colorado shootings. The usual JFK/911/Moon Landing/OKC Bombing
This is the only one I sort of watched. Don't they essplain it? I usually sluff off conspiracy kooks but this is different.
are you saying you believe it never happened?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
