What do you think of this statement?
|
|
What do you think of this statement?
racist
4 users like SoonerArtillery's post: KCRuf/Nek, ltsooner, SoCaliSooner, suncoastsooner
Is that mr. Biden?
It's a good way to get the Secret Service to learn your name.
3 users like oucub23's post: freeeewilly66, quatrogenerian, Teo9969
Silly and irrational
2 users like Val on the Getner's post: boomermagic, OUMallen
Would you like the person who said it to lead the gun violence/gun control task force?Originally Posted by Val on the Getner
Depends. That's quite a little bit of information upon which to judge a person's capabilities.
I think Barack Obama is the best president ever and is doing a great job.
- BM -
2 users like KCRuf/Nek's post: jdmt37, suncoastsooner
I wasn't providing a résumé.
But surely a "silly and irrational" statement about guns is an odd comment for someone now leading an anti gun, anti violence task force. No?
He could have evolved....
2 users like okie52's post: Col.JimBeam, IcanzIIravor
I think the entire gun task force should be lead of a cliff
Another cliff?
Yep. It gonna be a ****ing disaster for gun owners.
Politicians say silly and irrational things all the time. They also tend to be the people who lead task forces. Such is our system.
How many times have we seen this in the past? Maybe you older ****s on here can tell me but wasn't there a big push for gun reform after Charles Whitman? And wasn't one of the main reasons he was stopped was due to a well armed public?
whitman was killed by a cop.
I know but weren't there people on the ground with their own weapons firing at him and keeping him from shooting?
that i don't know. its thought that a brain tumor may have caused whitman to carry out the massacre.
This could be the one issue that will get Obama shot. **** marriage and taxes are one thing to piss the right off......but you start making it a point in this term to tackle gun ownership....and just the right wingnut will go off.
Should be interesting.
There's lots of people who hold their 2nd amendment right as sacred on both sides.
Enjoy your visit from the Secret Service
4 users like Val on the Getner's post: andymancan20, boomermagic, DHF, oucub23
Why would they want an old **** chevy car
3 users like Aurora's post: Eigenvalue, Mississippi Sooner, pbc2003
Noted.
However, this administration takes it to another level. Really, I respect it. I respect their ability to argue with themselves, and not be called on it. Very well done.
I wonder if they visited Biden after his comments. That would have been awkward. One unit is there to investigate, the other is there to protect. Are they allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques on the Vice? To project the Principal? I wonder.Enjoy your visit from the Secret Service
Still won't p**** the house if the 'Pubs want to remain a national party...
I have no faith in the pubs. If its not going to p****, than the 80 million gun owners need to make themselves heard loud and clear.
Didn't Unca Joe say that, along with taking his shotguns, about then candidate BHO?
Internal debate is a good thing, as it prevents rash action.
Well, considering the constant vetting and monitoring of every bit of conversation that the VP goes through, it was probably unnecessary.I wonder if they visited Biden after his comments. That would have been awkward. One unit is there to investigate, the other is there to protect. Are they allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques on the Vice? To project the Principal? I wonder.
The thought of Joe Biden with a gun in his hand is frightening. Even more frightening than **** Cheney. Though I suppose Biden hasn't actually shot anyone yet.
No, it's not internal debate at all. It's arguing against previous positions, and then acting like this was the position you were for all along with impunity toward the other side.Internal debate is a good thing, as it prevents rash action.
I mean, literally, Barry and Joe have said one thing when it benefits them, and then a year later will demonize anyone that takes the position they previously took while now taking the opposite view. It's irrational, political, calculating, and successful in duping the low information voters who elected them. It's a tactic originally developed by David Plouffe.
Example: You are unpatriotic for raising the debt limit, and you are unpatriotic for not raising the debt limit. Brilliant!
innocent misunderstanding...
when biden said "my"....he wasn't speaking as a US citizen.....he was speaking as a politician....
laws don't apply to politicians...
Raising taxes in a recession--good and bad, depending on what day it is.
You know, it's OK to change your mind.
Once again, gun sales go through the roof. No one is going to take your guns away. Talk about over reacting.
It is OK to change your mind when the facts of the situation dictate it.... not so much when it is just because it has become politically convenient to do so.
I think you are having trouble here.
It has nothing to do with the act of changing your mind.
And then act like anyone that agrees with your original position is a quack/wacko/unpatriotic/selfish, etc.It is OK to change your mind when the facts of the situation dictate it.... not so much when it is just because it has become politically convenient to do so.
Dont forget racist. From 2000 to 2008 all I heard from Liberals was that dissent was the highest form of patriotism. As soon as Obama was elected if you even questioned his policies (much less dissented) you were immediately labelled a racist.
4 users like Sancho's post: jdmt37, KCRuf/Nek, SoCaliSooner, SoonerArtillery
He'll just plagiarize Cheney's story and claim it as his own...
The following users like this post: KCRuf/Nek
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
