The following users like this post: Vodnik
I understand the physiology. Drawing the conclusion that its impossible to get pregnant from legitimate **** is ignorant and its false. To take this flawed argument and speak about it in a political context, as though you're an authority or its based on scientific fact, is irresponsible.
No, your kneejerk reaction to his quote is very irresponsible, especially when you don't understand the physiology. An attempt to explain and educate the public is not irresponsible on my part.
Here is his quote. “It seems to me, from what I understand from doctors, that’s really rare,” Akin told KTVI-TV. “If it’s a legitimate ****, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s ****ume that maybe that didn’t work or something: I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the child.”
I seriously doubt he knew the physiology that I just discussed. But he wasn't completely wrong in what he said. And some doctor may have tried to explain the ****ual response to him. No where in that quote did he say it is impossible to get pregnant from ****.
Do the police have to make an arrest for charges to be filed against someone for a crime? If not, then I would think some prosecutor is just chomping at the bit to try and make a name for themself on a high profile case like this. I believe this was the biggest reason the Duke lacrosse case went as far as it did. The da was dead set on getting a conviction in a profile case at all costs. On the flip side, it is UT football players, and they do tend to get lots of help from the litigation community down in Texas.
I read your comments. Even if she testifies under oath that she can't remember whether she consented to **** or not, that statement has very little bearing on the outcome of the case, especially if the prosecution's argument is that she was incapable of consent, the statements of the witnesses don't conform, etc.
I know that the concept of prepping and trying a case is completely lost on you, as it should be. And you aren't happy that you got owned on this thread. And that you are desperately trying to save face with idiotic insults about my competency to litigate.
But don't ****ing sit there and tell me you know one GD thing about prosecuting a case, and then tell me I don't know what I am talking about. You don't know **** about this subject.
Why don't we wait until the results from the investigation are heard,this feeding frenzy by these "experts" is worse than watching CNN this last week and the pissing contest going on in DC.
The following users like this post: Backintheday
The following users like this post: Tug Medick
I can't believe there are people actually defending Akin.
5 users like lycao's post: boomersooner53, brian, FtwTxSooner, GuidosLament, ngintunr
You are delusional. If anyone made an **** of them self here it was you for your failure to read and comprehend. I would say the fact you do something sure doesn't prove you are good at it. As far as ownership I think you over estimate yourself there as well. Again and I know this is hard for you but what I said was if she said she didn't know if she consented if an attorney is worth his salt there is no way a jury would convict. If you know otherwise post a link.
Try to concentrate here and understand I am not saying she said she was so drunk she couldn't consent.
5 users like OrangeBlossom's post: meandmybutt, okiediva, Spade1000, TenYards, usaosooner
3 users like Shooterms's post: McRib, ouwasp, soonerintn
And again, you are dead**** wrong. There are too many variables to make such a definitive statement. She could absolutely testify that she didn't know whether she consented or not, and the perp could be convicted. But you are too GD stupid to realize that. And you don't have the education or experience to realize how stupid you sound.Again and I know this is hard for you but what I said was if she said she didn't know if she consented if an attorney is worth his salt there is no way a jury would convict.
This argument is akin to me questioning you about the proper consistency of a Icee.
I once went home at 2 with a 10 and woke up at 10 with a 2
The following users like this post: SoonerBounce
Here again "Internet counsellor" let me make it easy for you if there is such a thing. I agree with this man
"In most of these kinds of cases, particularly when there's alcohol involved, you're looking to see if the person has consented," said Austin criminal defense attorney Perry Minton, who is not ****ociated with the case.
After reading the report, Minton says it does not appear the woman recalls if she consented to having **** or not.""The unfortunate thing is if you cannot remember whether or not you gave consent the state is going to have an impossible time of putting somebody in jail for it,"
He not only is known for actually practicing law on the net but he does it in real life and damn if the two of us don't agree. Note both he and I are NOT ****ociated with the case. Sorry but you lose this one as well. Perhaps you need to do some Icee research because it seems you lack a bit on your law training.He is saying exactly what I am saying. Does he sound stupid as well?
If you intend to defend your misguided opinion read up on reasonable doubt so I won't have to start from the beginning on that.
According to those in the know he is as wrong on this as well.
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/a...ighly-unlikely again this man is someone who knows.
The following users like this post: BernieMadoff
POST THIS **** IN OC OR TD YOU ****S
have a nice day
I do hope you are comforted by others who are misguided as you are.
Well it has been fun but I'm off to my job making Icee's at the 7-11. I'm sure you are worn out as well and I know if you are here arguing with me there is an empty seat on the trash truck somewhere and I'm sure you are missed.
mccoy needs to hire the texas hammer for his lawyer ... that guy sounds mean as **** on the radio.
The following users like this post: meandmybutt
2 users like beelzeBob's post: brokebacksooner, McRib
I think this guy could be helpful in sorting out this mess
Last edited by usaosooner; 12-29-2012 at 08:31 PM. Reason: broke link
I was being a smart ****. I didn't see anything wrong with the debate about if the girls comments caused this case to be a win for the rapists. But the admin didn't like it I guess. Posting pictures making fun a McCoy and Hicks is ok but debate about the possible court case isn't. I don't get it.
The following users like this post: greensooner
The following users like this post: greensooner
He's meaner than a junkyard dog. He doesn't bark, he bites. The Hammer will get you every penny you deserve.
But seriously, the Hammer goes for clients that want to sue for money they dont deserve. The Hammer doesn't look to defend alleged criminals. He would more likely be her lawyer suing the players and the university (some trumped up bull**** reason).
The following users like this post: DirtySouth_Sooner
Hicks will walk.http://www.mbfc.com/
^ misleading post. I swear some of you guys post things that have no meaning just to make this thread longer. Wait until some new information comes out then post it. ****.
I'm not buying the whole **** thing. My hunch is that chick got drunk and her inner party chick came out and he wanted a threesome with some football players. Once she sobered up she probably felt used and embarrassed and had a big case of the "oh ****'s" and realized shed have to explain to her friends how she ho bagged out. Still buzzed, she thinks that selling the "I was ****d" story will be easier than saying "I got wasted and boned two guys I don't know who left my **** after one of them got some."
In the report she even mentions feeling "ashamed to say this", which leads me to believe the cops think the same thing. If they were pretty sure she was ****d, those two guys would be sitting in jail right now. She's more ashamed that her friends probably warned her not to go get laid and now she's going to tweak the situation where here circle of chicks will look on her with sympathy instead of disgust.
Seriously?
If a chick is alone in a bar, she's there to get laid.
If she's there with a group of friends, they are the biggest **** blockers out there..,especially the fat friend. Nobody is as cruel and judgmental about a chicks ****ual proclivities like her friends are. They'll straight up gossip about that ho all while pretending to have her best interests in mind.
**** your an idiot ... so a girl who is embarrassed/ashamed of what happened would think it's easier to go to cops/media/public? She's too embarrassed to tell her friends but not embarrassed to tell the world and the scrutiny she would receive from the longhorn fan base?
hey dip**** ... I'm not say that she is not lying ... but for you to think its easy to tell the world you've been ****d is you pure stupidity on your part.
The following users like this post: BernieMadoff
I think you all got it wrong. Remember the "Brokeback" picture? Case and Hicks were getting it on consentually. The drunk girl was claiming she was forced to watch.
She didn't tell "the world", she was still smelling like booze and called the cops.
I've seen many a chick call 911 and claim she was ****d. Cops and fire get there and you find out she's just pissed off that some dude had a wife, girfriend, didn't make love to her all night like he said he would at the club and just pumped a few times..nutted...and left, or how was she going to explain having fun to her churchy friends...there's endless times that a **** call has not been the case at all.