|
|
Kevin Wilson didn't do as well with Landry Jones as the QB either. With that said, yes, OU should give the ball to Millard more and Heupel should quit changing tempos in the same series and OU needs to pick an offensive philosophy that doesn't fall into the category of "a little bit of everything", because that philosophy doesn't work in the big games.Originally Posted by madillsoonerfan5353
If he's lost weight, it's been VERY recently. The link is a pic of him in our local BBQ pit last August (his son was our OC @ the time, he's since taken a GA position at Arkansas).
http://talksec.com/818810/coach-mangino
He was at the TCU game and he was still large and in charge.
No to Mangino. Yes to the ucla O-line coach.
He said that the news would be out before NSD, possibly by tomorrow. I was't commenting as to it's accuracy.
As for ND kicking OU's ****, I actually predicted OU would beat ND. I was adimant OU wouldn't blow ND out (especially before the season had even started), which made people on here very mad. Obviously I was pleasantly suprised.
I don't remember asking you if you needed anything. Why don't you get lost?
Thanks for the info Irish.
Yes, thanks for having an avatar of Lying ****hole crushing Happy Feet.
The fact that no OU fan started a post on this board about what could be significant coaching news
just shows us how far WWLS has fallen in the eyes of most OU fans.
No problem. I might add that it sounded like it was a positive thing, not like Stoops is leaving or something like that. He acted as though it would be a positve addition to the staff. Just thought some of you guys might want to know.
I only listen to Rodgers most of the time. I listen while I'm at work. Sometimes I just as soon listen to the junk on the animal as I do the junk on the music channels.
You hit the nail on the head, he has got to get healthy. The sad thing is he has had a lot of down time to do so.
what's this about OU making some coaching changes? Mark Rodgers said they are bringing in some big-time names after NSD is over
To be fair I listened to it as well and unless he gave more info as the show went on. He said. I am hearing OU is going to make changes the masses are going to happy about. I dont know when its going to happen, but if I had to guess it would be after national signing day. Criag tried to dig and Mark wasnt giving up much more info than that.
We get it IrishFan, Notre Dame won
You may move on
To add more fuel to the fire.
http://oklahoma.247sports.com/Articl...-Coming-114097
I'm not the one who brought it up. And I never onced rubbed it in after it happend in October. I could, for you, if you like, however.
Can't decommit once you sign, thats the point I think hes trying to make
Okay...I LOL'd when I saw this...thanks!This one, maybe..
Mangino would run off half of the linemen, but the ones who stayed would be pretty good.
Think of how many opposing coaches would remind players of who Mangino is while recruiting against us. No thank you.
No, that's the point I'm trying to make. He said "before" NSD. I'm saying wait until after.
If it was an beneficial addition to the staff, which is how I intereprted what Mark was saying (but could be wrong), how would that hurt NSD?
Well as a know-nothing fan I wouldn't really know. I'm not aware of what coaches are telling players. If players are aware and they have been recruiting as such then there wouldn't be any problems. But as mentioned earlier, the change of Venables and Martinez did have an impact on players last year. So, you can see that a surprise change can have a negative impact on recruiting, but a positive change that recruits are aware of would have a minimal to no impact. Agree?
Lots of revisionist history here. Sorry, I am not enough of a Pollyanna to forget that by far the worst OL during Stoops' tenure and the least amount of commitment to the running game were on Mangino's watch. Not to mention he would be AIDS on the recruiting trail.
2 users like eddyjizza's post: OU812, srburkhart
Will you please? I'm bored
Did you forget the only NC OU has won with Bob as head coach also had Mangino as OC ? I think the good would outweigh{Pun intended} the bad.
No, but that is about as flawed of logic as it gets.
Maybe, Maybe not.
Purely coincidence. Any of our OC's would have been fine on the 2000 team. Do you know why?
It's because we actually played DEFENSE!! Our offense and running game had plenty of struggles with Mangino. Our D and ST were really good back then. Mangino is NOT the answer. I have a novel idea. Why don't we search for the best candidate, not Bobs friends.
The following users like this post: SECsooner
Or another out of work fired coach ala Mike Stoops and Kim Tush. Best coach is a novel idea to Bob.
Of course boomermagic would want to hire Mangino back. He isn't very smart.
2 users like fdubzou's post: oorah_okie, Soonerlife
I wouldn't be against what you suggest but I still wouldn't be against Mangino either.. He is a proven coach.
Wow, Talk about not being smart.. heh..
I'm in favor of hiring ANYONE that can help this team! If that someone turns out to be Big Mark then so be it! Just get rid of the weak links and get some new blood in here! ...
The following users like this post: boomermagic
FWIW. I thought heard someone on the Animal say that Carey Murdoch was reporting that Patton was gone. Not sure who said it, and I can't link the radio show?? I haven't seen this reported on here.
Is Mangino working anywhere now?
Crickets.
Why would OU need somebody that nobody else wants?
I'll bite....
To keep company with the other 2 or 3 coaches we already have that no one else wants?
The following users like this post: OUrage
ZING!!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
