If they are opposed to it, I submit the following.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business...-wedding-cake/
|
|
If they are opposed to it, I submit the following.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business...-wedding-cake/
Religion =/= business.Originally Posted by oucub23
2 users like SpankyNek's post: Aurora, OnlyOneOklahoma
I don't think businesses are allowed to discriminate. Otherwise we would still have unironic whites only lunch counters.
Plus, that is a state law which you should be fine with. If those business owners want to discriminate, they should move somewhere that allows them to do so.
The following users like this post: Aurora
I seem to remember a bakery not making a **** themed cake for some kids birthday party. Of course that sort of discrimination is okay in the eyes of some.
Comparing ****s to the ****s is super nice of you KC -__-
That is play numero uno for many cons.
Was just saying that it has happened before and the people didn't have to make the cake. Whether they were ****s, gheys, midgets, dogs whoever didn't matter to me. It shouldn't matter who the offended party is to make it right or wrong(Although we know how that works).
Oh please. If this were God fearing bunker lovers your tolerance level would be a bit different. As I just told AD I cited another instance where this happened. I wasn't comparing one group to another. Lose your agenda.
4 users like KCRuf/Nek's post: Aurora, Irish_Sooner, soonerintn, Tundra
Yeah because comparing **** cakes to **** cakes is totally not calling ****s ****s.
The level of discourse on this board is cratering.
Discriminate against **** cake--problem
Discriminate against **** cake--no problem
Point being made that some types of discrimination are okay. Instead, point inferred is that ****s = ****s.
5 users like oucub23's post: Gonzo, Irish_Sooner, KCRuf/Nek, Stinger_1066, Tundra
Mmmm cake.
3 users like McRib's post: Aurora, brokebacksooner, KCRuf/Nek
I have no problem with the bakery in this case.
Same. If the couple came in and the bakery wouldn't sell them a doughnut or a cup of coffee, I'd have a problem with that. Making a wedding cake is a much more involved process, and is tailored to the specific person.
I was denied a haircut in a black barber shop in Philadelphia, they told me and my friend that they don't cut white people hair. I should have contacted the ACLU.
The following users like this post: Tundra
It's not. You read have a comprehension problem.
No. Blacks disrespecting whites is okay. Payback is a ****.
Funny
**** lovers aren't a protected cl**** according to the law (Oregon Equality Law of 2007); ****s are. The baker could also refuse to make a confederate flag cake or a gun cake and be within the law.
There are plenty of bakers in Oregon who would be willing to make these ladies a cake, filing a complaint seem petty.
3 users like brokebacksooner's post: Aurora, oucub23, Stinger_1066
I agree. But the level of discourse in America is cratering, a lot coming from both sides.
It has always been acceptable to discriminate against ****s since I have been around... Is the next GOP platform an unironic return to ****sm?Discriminate against **** cake--problem
Discriminate against **** cake--no problem
Point being made that some types of discrimination are okay. Instead, point inferred is that ****s = ****s.
It's not about getting their cake made. It's about making noise about it.
Your friends at the ACLU seem to differ. Of course they stuck up for NAMBLA too.
Someone learned a new word today and seem very proud to use it.
It only is if you're a ****ing moron.
Leave me out of this.
The following users like this post: oucub23
I would think bakers would want to get in on the **** cake business.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
